16.marker.48-49

Resource Type: 
File
File Type: 
microsoft excel xlsx file
Download: 
Download File NameAvailable atSizeMD5
16.marker.48-49.xlsxCarrotOmics53.24KB0ae6d2a0c5f67c96157cceb7afac2cc9
Description: 

Linkage map markers and information.

References: 
The following records refer to this file:
Genetic MapLoading content
Featuremap: 
NameDescriptionUnits

An F2 population derived from a heterozygous P1p1 F1 intercross between B1896 (true-breeding p1p1 yellow-rooted F4M inbred derived from the cross PI 173687 × B493), and B7262 (P1P1 purple exterior with orange inner phloem and xylem inbred from the same cross) was self-pollinated to produce population 10117. A total of 370 SSR primer pairs (156 GSSRs, 144 BSSRs, 70 ESSRs) and 21 AFLP primer combinations were evaluated. Of the 370 SSR markers initially evaluated for polymorphism and mode of segregation in the F2 population, 44 (11.9 %) were polymorphic, presented unambigous band patterns, and had segregation ratios consistent with single loci. Only these SSR markers, of which 36 were codominant and 8 were dominant, were included in the linkage analysis. Twenty-one AFLP primer combinations amplified 891 bands of which 283 (31.8 %) were polymorphic in the F2 population. A total of 17 anthocyanin genes (10 structural and seven regulatory genes) were initially screened and eight polymorphic genes used for mapping. The genotypes of polymorphic markers were recorded according to the symbols required by Mapmaker/EXP version 3.0 as follows: homozygous maternal “A”, homozygous paternal “B”, heterozygous “H”, not A “C”, not B “D”, and missing data “−”. The degree of marker segregation distortion in the F2 was determined by marker data comparison against the expected 3:1 and 1:2:1 ratio for dominant and codominant markers, respectively, using Chi square tests, where significant distortion was declared at P < 0.01. Because the parental allelic phase was unknown, codominant markers were double-scored by switching the presumed allelic origin. All markers were entered into Mapmaker/EXP version 3.0 for analysis. Markers were grouped with the two-point “group” command at LOD = 4.0 and a maximum recombination frequency value of 0.25. Markers within a group were ordered using the Order command with LOD of 3.0. The remaining markers were then located with the Ripple command. The groups were mapped using the Kosambi mapping function.

Carrot linkage maps for both parental lines were constructed using 279 marker data points. These included 2 phenotypic loci (P1 and Y2), 237 AFLPs, 40 SSRs, 1 SCAR, 5 anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes (F3H, FLS1, LDOX2, PAL3, and UFGT), and 3 anthocyanin transcription factors (DcEFR1, DcMYB3, and DcMYB5) with 45 of them (15.7 %) being codominant markers. Additionally, 24 markers (22 AFLPs and 2 SSRs) were unlinked. Based on known chromosome location of molecular (SSR) and phenotypic (Y2) markers, LGs were assigned to their respective chromosomes. Anthocyanin biosynthesis genes and transcription factors we mapped only occurred on carrot chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8, and these linkage data and maps are summarized in Table 4 and Fig. 5, respectively.

cM

An F2 population derived from a heterozygous P1p1 F1 intercross between B1896 (true-breeding p1p1 yellow-rooted F4M inbred derived from the cross PI 173687 × B493), and B7262 (P1P1 purple exterior with orange inner phloem and xylem inbred from the same cross) was self-pollinated to produce population 10117. A total of 370 SSR primer pairs (156 GSSRs, 144 BSSRs, 70 ESSRs) and 21 AFLP primer combinations were evaluated. Of the 370 SSR markers initially evaluated for polymorphism and mode of segregation in the F2 population, 44 (11.9 %) were polymorphic, presented unambigous band patterns, and had segregation ratios consistent with single loci. Only these SSR markers, of which 36 were codominant and 8 were dominant, were included in the linkage analysis. Twenty-one AFLP primer combinations amplified 891 bands of which 283 (31.8 %) were polymorphic in the F2 population. A total of 17 anthocyanin genes (10 structural and seven regulatory genes) were initially screened and eight polymorphic genes used for mapping. The genotypes of polymorphic markers were recorded according to the symbols required by Mapmaker/EXP version 3.0 as follows: homozygous maternal “A”, homozygous paternal “B”, heterozygous “H”, not A “C”, not B “D”, and missing data “−”. The degree of marker segregation distortion in the F2 was determined by marker data comparison against the expected 3:1 and 1:2:1 ratio for dominant and codominant markers, respectively, using Chi square tests, where significant distortion was declared at P < 0.01. Because the parental allelic phase was unknown, codominant markers were double-scored by switching the presumed allelic origin. All markers were entered into Mapmaker/EXP version 3.0 for analysis. Markers were grouped with the two-point “group” command at LOD = 4.0 and a maximum recombination frequency value of 0.25. Markers within a group were ordered using the Order command with LOD of 3.0. The remaining markers were then located with the Ripple command. The groups were mapped using the Kosambi mapping function.

Carrot linkage maps for both parental lines were constructed using 279 marker data points. These included 2 phenotypic loci (P1 and Y2), 237 AFLPs, 40 SSRs, 1 SCAR, 5 anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes (F3H, FLS1, LDOX2, PAL3, and UFGT), and 3 anthocyanin transcription factors (DcEFR1, DcMYB3, and DcMYB5) with 45 of them (15.7 %) being codominant markers. Additionally, 24 markers (22 AFLPs and 2 SSRs) were unlinked. Based on known chromosome location of molecular (SSR) and phenotypic (Y2) markers, LGs were assigned to their respective chromosomes. Anthocyanin biosynthesis genes and transcription factors we mapped only occurred on carrot chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8, and these linkage data and maps are summarized in Table 4 and Fig. 5, respectively.

cM
Loading content
License: 
NameAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
License Summary

You are free to:

  • Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt: remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the following license terms:

  • Attribution You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Full Legal Texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode