16.marker.80-81

Resource Type: 
File
File Type: 
microsoft excel xlsx file
Download: 
Download File NameAvailable atSizeMD5
16.marker.80-81.xlsxCarrotOmics39.67KBdf1cbe0926d4c75adb30b76dd1f0980f
Description: 

Linkage map markers and information.

References: 
The following records refer to this file:
Genetic MapLoading content
Featuremap: 
NameDescriptionUnits

We used the R/qtl software for the linkage map construction (Broman 2010). Only the markers with a chi-square less than 9.2 were kept for the analysis, the others ones were declared as distorted markers. The analysis included 101 samples and 73 markers: Among the markers analyzed, we had 9 putative genes markers, 43 ESSR, 18 GSSR and 3 BSSR. Data file is presented in Appendix 6.

We used the function est.rf (data) to estimate the recombination fraction between each pair of markers and we calculated with this same function the LOD score for a test of recombination fraction of 0.5. The results obtained were used to create the linkage groups with the function formLinkageGroups( ). We chose as arguments a maximum recombination fraction of 0.35 and a minimum LOD score of 2. Within the linkage groups, the markers were ordered with the function order.Markers ( ) and we finally obtained the linkage map presented in Appendix 7. Distance between markers were calculated in centi Morgan

We also constructed a plot of the linkage map with R (using Kosambi function) but the image obtained was too complicated to be presented here. In order to present a clearer plot of the map, we also construct linkage map with the software JoinMap (using Kosambi function) but we keep the results of the linkage map constructed by R to do the QTL analysis.

The map presented on this page is the JoinMap+Kosambi analysis. For the R QTL map see SS1061QTL.

We initially obtained 23 linkage groups after the preliminary analysis but the plot of LOD score indicated that some alleles had to be switched and two markers (CCD1 and GGPPS2) could not be linked with others markers because of their low numbers of data. After removing these two markers and switching some alleles, we finally obtained 10 linkage groups.

cM

We used the R/qtl software for the linkage map construction (Broman 2010). Only the markers with a chi-square less than 9.2 were kept for the analysis, the others ones were declared as distorted markers. The analysis included 101 samples and 73 markers: Among the markers analyzed, we had 9 putative genes markers, 43 ESSR, 18 GSSR and 3 BSSR. Data file is presented in Appendix 6.

We used the function est.rf (data) to estimate the recombination fraction between each pair of markers and we calculated with this same function the LOD score for a test of recombination fraction of 0.5. The results obtained were used to create the linkage groups with the function formLinkageGroups( ). We chose as arguments a maximum recombination fraction of 0.35 and a minimum LOD score of 2. Within the linkage groups, the markers were ordered with the function order.Markers ( ) and we finally obtained the linkage map presented in Appendix 7. Distance between markers were calculated in centi Morgan

We also constructed a plot of the linkage map with R (using Kosambi function) but the image obtained was too complicated to be presented here. In order to present a clearer plot of the map, we also construct linkage map with the software JoinMap (using Kosambi function) but we keep the results of the linkage map constructed by R to do the QTL analysis.

The map presented on this page is the R QTL analysis. For the JoinMap+Kosambi map see SS1061.

We also used R/qtl software to do the QTL analysis. Composite interval mapping with Haley-Knott regression (Haley and Knott, 1992) is usually considered as the more powerful method for QTL analysis but our phenotypic data did not fit a normal distribution. As we could not use this method in our case, we used a non parametric interval mapping. We used the function scanone ( ) and we chose one thousand as permutation number. QTL analysis was performed for seven phenotypic traits: lycopene, phytoene, xanthophyll, α-carotene, β-carotene, ζ-carotene and γ-carotene.

cM
Loading content
License: 
NameAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
License Summary

You are free to:

  • Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt: remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the following license terms:

  • Attribution You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Full Legal Texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode